De-Mystifying the “Mystical Stigmata” of Judith von Halle


Since 2004, German anthroposophist, Judith von Halle (b.1972), has publicly claimed that she regularly experiences the “bleeding wounds of Christ”―the mystical stigmata―together with inedia (the ability to survive on very little food and water) and clairvoyant visions. Not surprisingly, these claims erupted into immediate sensationalism and controversy within the anthroposophical community; resulting in a deep, substantial and continuing division between influential detractors and wealthy supporters. Von Halle’s most vocal detractor has been prominent Russian anthroposophist, Sergei O. Prokofieff (1955‒2015); while her most public supporter has been well-known German anthroposophist, Peter Tradowsky (b.1934).

In order to understand this heated and often rancorous intellectual polarization, it is necessary to delve deeply into the curious phenomena known as the “mystical stigmata.” Typically, the mystical stigmata are marks, sores or wounds that spontaneously appear on the physical body of a Christian devotee which correspond primarily with the crucifixion piercings of Christ-Jesus in his hands, feet and side. Occasionally these may also include the forehead (where the crown of thorns was placed) and the back (where the scourging was inflicted).

Though St. Paul may have been the first recorded mystical stigmatist, based on the scriptural statement: “I bear on my body the marks [in Greek: ‘stigmata’] of Jesus” (Gal 6:17), St. Francis of Assisi (c.1181‒1226) is most often given the historical credit in 1224. Since that time there have been well over 300 reliable instances of the mystical stigmata being recorded, of which about 60 can be attributed to various saints. Even though many saints have experienced the mystical stigmata, such as St. Catherine of Siena (1347‒1380) and St. Padre Pio of Pietrelcina (1887‒1968), the Catholic Church does not consider the mystical stigmata to be an indication of saintliness, or an incontestable instance of a miracle. In fact, the Church is extremely cautious and reserved about reported cases of mystical stigmata; and therefore conducts a thorough investigation into such claims before any official acceptance.

While there have certainly been numerous instances of fraudulent mystical stigmata (such as self-mutilation), so far in authentic instances there has been no conclusive scientific explanation. While hypnotism and auto-suggestion have produced some mild psychosomatic effects, the force of ordinary imagination does not appear strong enough to produce mystical stigmata. Even so, both Church and science are reluctant to attribute non-physical, supernatural causes to mystical stigmata.

So what does esoteric Christianity and the spiritual scientific (anthroposophical) investigations of Rudolf Steiner (1861‒1925) have to say about mystical stigmata? Basically, that these unusual phenomena are indeed the result of an exceptional psychosomatic process. In this case the disciple of Christ-Jesus passionately identifies and vicariously empathizes with the horrific sufferings on the Cross. These excruciating feelings and emotions are so powerfully aroused and held in the astral body that they forcefully impinge on and press into the etheric or life body. Since the etheric body contains the formative forces that determine the shape and life activity of the physical body, wounds will actually corporeally appear. More than mental imagery, then, it is powerful religious emotion that produces the mystical stigmata.

Furthermore, as was the case of St. Francis, certain dedicated followers of Christ-Jesus have been privileged to interweave a copy of the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth into their own astral bodies. As explained by Rudolf Steiner in a lecture given on 6 April 1909 (and published in The Principle of Spiritual Economy; 1986):

In the period spanning the eleventh through the fifteenth centuries the time had come when a copy of the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth was woven into the astral bodies of certain reincarnated souls. From the eleventh to the fourteenth centuries many human beings, for example Francis of Assisi and Elisabeth of Thüringen, had the imprint of the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth woven into them while their own astral bodies—the source of their knowledge—were formed during reincarnation. This enabled these individuals to proclaim the great truths of Christianity in the form of judgments, logical constructs, and scientific wisdom. But, in addition, they were also able to experience the feeling of carrying the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth within themselves.

Your eyes will be opened if you allow yourselves to experience vicariously all the humility, the devotion, and the Christian love that was part of Francis of Assisi. You will then know how to look at him as a person prone to make mistakes—because he possessed his own ego—and as a great individual because he carried a copy of the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth within his own astral body. All the humble feelings, the profound mysticism, and the spiritual soul life of Francis of Assisi become comprehensible if we know this one secret of his life.

Since a replica of the astral body of Christ-Jesus preserves the entire emotional record of the crucifixion, the bearer of such additional astral forces can more easily re-experience the Saviour’s anguish and suffering on the cross. Not surprisingly, then, the mystical stigmata first appeared around the time of St. Francis. It is quite logical to conclude, therefore, that many other Christians who have experienced the mystical stigmata over the centuries did so because of an interweaving with a replica of Christ-Jesus’ astral body.

Also noteworthy in regard to the mystical stigmata is that these phenomena have almost exclusively occurred throughout history within the monastic confines of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. This was because the difficult developmental path of Mystic-Christianity requires prayerful solitude and seclusion from worldly concerns. Though this developmental path differs from Rosicrucian-Christianity, it leads nonetheless to an authentic encounter with Christ-Jesus in the superphysical realm.

According to the research of Rudolf Steiner, the mystical stigmata very often spontaneously occur during the intense meditations of the fourth stage of Mystic-Christian initiatory development, known as “The Crucifixion.”  As described in a lecture given on 27 November 1906 entitled “The Gospel of St. John and Ancient Mysteries”:

[As] a fourth experience he had to develop the feeling that his body was no more for him than any other object in the world. He carried the body with him only as an instrument … In this way the mystic experienced in himself the Crucifixion. He saw himself crucified. The outer symbol was that during the meditation stigmata appeared at the places of the wounds of Christ―in the hands, in the feet and in the right side. This is the blood-trial of the Mystic, the fourth stage of initiation.

From the foregoing information, we can clearly see that the mystical stigmata is an initiatory experience which commonly occurs on the developmental path of Mystic-Christianity that has been historically practiced within the monastic orders of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. Moreover, it is also associated with the replicated astral body of Christ-Jesus. It is not an experience that is common to or associated with the developmental path of Rosicrucian-Christianity.

Since the anthroposophical spiritual science of Rudolf Steiner promotes the Rosicrucian-Christian path of initiatory development, not the path of Mystic-Christianity, the stigmatist Judith von Halle is an obvious anomaly within the anthroposophical movement. If in fact her claims of mystical stigmata, inedia and visionary experience are genuine, then obviously she has been following a Mystic-Christian path of development, rather than the Rosicrucian-Christian path as encouraged in anthroposophy. Since Mystic-Christian development is a “path of the heart”―of affective development―not a “path of the head”―of intellectual development―(as is practiced in Rosicrucian-Christian development), von Halle’s connection with anthroposophy is clearly an attempt to cognitively understand and explain her own mystical experiences.

Some overly-suspicious anthroposophists regard von Halle as a Catholic “Trojan Horse”; that is, a covert means of introducing Catholic practices―such as mystical stigmata, inedia and personal visions―into the anthroposophical movement. And even though her early education included attending a Jesuit-run high school in Berlin, this is hardly proof that this Jewish stigmatist is some nefarious Catholic infiltrator seeking to subvert anthroposophy.

Nevertheless, as demonstrated by both science and the Catholic Church, the anthroposophical leadership has a right and a duty to be cautious regarding claims of mystical stigmata within its membership. As yet, there has been no objective scientific or medical investigation into von Halle’s claims. Of the anthroposophical leadership in Dornach, the only one who has seriously challenged von Halle’s various claims has been Sergei Prokofieff. While some anthroposophists have considered many of his statements and conclusions to be overly harsh, no doubt von Halle would be just as critically assessed under a Catholic Church investigation. Without an objective investigation into her claims, most anthroposophists are left to accept these claims “on faith,” which runs entirely contrary to the scientific approach of anthroposophy.

As Prokofieff indicated in numerous instances, based solely on von Halle’s published pronouncements, her veracity as a reliable esoteric teacher is seriously called into question. One glaringly-mistaken assertion that von Halle has made is that her “alleged” mystical stigmata is the result of incorporating the “phantom” or “resurrection body” of Christ-Jesus. As Prokofieff correctly pointed out, stigmatic effects have nothing to do with the “phantom” of Christ-Jesus, since this perfected physical form is no longer “wounded” in any way (even from past memory). Moreover, as previously indicated, if any vehicle of Christ-Jesus is associated with stigmata, it is a replica of Christ-Jesus’ astral body, not the phantom.

By associating her “alleged” stigmata with the Saviour’s phantom, von Halle is clearly sending the message that her mystical condition is the result of a special connection with Christ-Jesus; rather than just a predictable effect of Mystic-Christian meditation. This of course lends more weight to her pronouncements by fallaciously “appealing to authority.” Furthermore, is von Halle suggesting that all authentic instances of mystical stigmata are physical effects of the phantom body of Christ-Jesus, or just her own? Even if von Halle’s mystical stigmata proved to be authentic, this does not mean that all her visionary pronouncements and explanations are accurate.

Another glaringly-mistaken assertion that von Halle has made is that Rudolf Steiner is also the Master Serapis. While Rudolf Steiner is certainly one of the twelve bodhisattva-masters of the Great White Lodge, he is definitely not Serapis. Steiner has indicated that Serapis and Skythianos are one and the same exalted individuality, but never once suggested that this individuality was he himself.

While Prokofieff has pointed out numerous other mistaken visionary assertions by von Halle, even the two glaring errors indicated here are sufficient to call into question her esoteric accuracy. This should come as no surprise since von Halle (as did Prokofieff) chose to ignore Rudolf Steiner’s clear esoteric admonition: “I had reached the age of 40, an age before which no one in the sense of a master may openly appear as a teacher of occultism. Everywhere where someone teaches earlier than this there is an error (Correspondence and Documents 1901-1925).” When she began to publicly disseminate her esoteric ideas in book form in 2005, von Halle was only thirty-three. Does she think that this strict esoteric requirement applies only to Rudolf Steiner (a bodhisattva-master), but not to herself because she is somehow more advanced because of mystical stigmata?

While Judith von Halle may be a warm and friendly person (as attested to by others), this does not mean that she is an accurate and reliable esoteric teacher. Even without authenticating her alleged mystical stigmata, von Halle can be reliably assessed on the basis of her published ideas. As biblically expressed: “Beware of false prophets … You will know them by their fruits” (Matt 7:15,16). Unfortunately for discerning anthroposophists, von Halle bears bitter fruit.

8 thoughts on “De-Mystifying the “Mystical Stigmata” of Judith von Halle

  1. Dennis

    If any spiritual master of the 20th century was the Boddhisatva, it was Valentin Tomberg, whose spiritual depth and profundity far surpass Steiner.

    1. Ron MacFarlane Post author

      Sorry Dennis,

      For any unbiased esoteric investigator, it is clear that Valentin Tomberg was not a recognized initiate who had no clairvoyant ability and who gained all his advanced knowledge from Rudolf Steiner.

  2. Podvig

    I agree, I read her books, and they make your etheric eyes sting! She may well have induced stigmata in herself, but its appearance as a stage of initiation is temporary, like the headache with the crowning of thorns; it doesn’t go on and on.
    Although I had no time for Prokofieff, I have to admit that his hatchet-job on J. von Halle was pretty accurate. And as you say, she made so many statements that just aren’t true that those alone would make one not take her seriously.

  3. Kali

    Rudolf Steiner was by no means the bodhisattva of the 20th century! This is a very serious occult mistake!

    As of Judith von Halle, I would recommend you to read the lecture of D. Mangurov “Die Geheimnisse von Golgatha” on the, where there is a good explanation of the stigmatization and the intolerance of food.

    Best regards!

  4. nic dejour

    It is of interest that some individuals choose to identify with torture and pain.

    Rather they could instead be inspired by the kindness, love, and joy of Christ. The positive side doesn’t make waves like the pain and blood.

    When an open minded stigmatist is counseled to identify with the positive side of Jesus, the stigmata disappears.

    The mind is extremely powerful. See associated studies in Psychoneuroimmunology, Dr. Mario Martinez, etc.

  5. Rob Steinbuch

    I want to make the following remarks;
    – In which lecture(s) has Rudolf Steiner stated that mystical stigmata are the result of an exceptional psychosomatic process?
    – In which lecture has he stated that there is a relation between the bearing of the astral body of Christ-Jesus and the formation of permanent stigmata?
    – In the past, stigmatisation indeed occurred mostly within monastic confines, because mystical meditation could only be practised at those places. Today, this picture has changed. Mystical meditation can be practised almost “everwhere”. An example is the permanent stigmatisation of Adrienne von Speyr from Basel in 1942, which took place at home. She closely worked together with Hans Urs von Balthasar.
    – Rudolf Steiner has only mentioned stigmatisation in the context of the Christian initiation path. He did so in 13 lectures between 1906 and 1911. In most of these cases he mentioned the “ordeal of the blood” , which refer to the temporary occurrence of red spots on the skin. This phenomenon is well known as a kind of warning to the person: ”do you really agree to continue?”. If the answer is yes, the permanent stigmatisation occurs, including other, drastical, changes in the constitution of the person involved. This is described in GA 131, lecture of 12 October 1911. Judith von Halle also experienced the formation of the red spots before her permanent stigmatisation in 2004.
    – Rudolf Steiner stated that the Christian initiation path is indeed more exceptional than the rosicrusian one, but it will still occur.
    – Judith von Halle has never stated that Rudolf Steiner is also the Master Serapis. Please read her book correctly!
    – Judith von Halle is not being considered as “a teacher of occultism”, certainly not by herself!
    – She visited Holland in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2015, to give lectures. These lectures were well appreciated by the about 300 attendants.
    – Judith always stands open for critical remarks, to improve the quality of her work.

    1. Ron MacFarlane Post author


      Thanks for taking the time to comment on my post about Judith von Halle. I’m aware that you’re a von Halle supporter, and one of the signatories of the “open letter” to Sergei Prokofieff concerning his critique of von Halle in Time Journeys. Nevertheless, I would like to reply to a couple of statements that you made:

      (1)“Judith von Halle has never stated that Rudolf Steiner is also the Master Serapis.”

      Not only did Prokofieff point this out, but Executive Council emerita, Virginia Sease, is also quoted as saying:

      “Sergei Prokofieff’s results are easily followed, fully understandable, and verifiable through one’s own research. To cite only one example among many: in Judith von Halle’s portrayal of Rudolf Steiner’s spiritual identity (see Rudolf Steiner, Master of the White Lodge) she connects him with a being known in occult circles as Serapis. Not only is the explanation she suggests for this name complex, but erroneous … For my part, I think it entirely inappropriate to speculate about Rudolf Steiner’s identity, let alone in this way.

      (2) “Judith von Halle is not being considered as “a teacher of occultism”, certainly not by herself!”

      How do you explain that von Halle has written a number of “esoteric” books and given numerous “esoteric” lectures if she is not wanting to be a “teacher of occultism”? Surely she is expecting people to “learn” something from what she is publicly saying; and that makes her a “teacher” whether she admits it or not.

  6. Marco de meijer

    I am indifferent with respect to J von Halle’s teachings – but I find your analysis very shaky. It is never a good idea to use Steiner’s messages to prove something. Steiner’s expressions are often contradictory and for good reasons. Your statement, for instance about who Steiner IS is very bold and I would like to know if it is based on your spiritual research or on logical deduction or simply a guess based on emotion.
    I would stick with following the spiritual paths that Steiner has shown (and lived) and learn from anyone who has something real to say. It may be that Judith’s teachings are clumsy and out of kelter but perhaps there is something new for you to find there too.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *